Prediction of Betty Batt vs Myriam De Borman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

B. Batt vs M. De Borman

Betty Batt
Betty Batt

Flag GBR GBR

l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
w
Myriam De Borman
Myriam De Borman

Flag BEL BEL

l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

109
Age
110
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Batt 1 - 0 Borman

They have played 3 sets in total, with Betty Batt winning 2 and Myriam De Borman winning 1. The last match between Betty Batt and Myriam De Borman was at the Queens Club, 17-06-1946, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Betty Batt getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Batt1
Borman0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3Queens Club(06-17-46)

Grass
GBR Flag
Betty Batt
3
6
6
BEL Flag
Myriam De Borman
6
3
2

B. Batt vs M. D. Borman H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
49.46% (92-94)Career Total W/L52.73% (29-26)
1Grass0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

B. Batt vs M. D. Borman Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Betty Batt has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Myriam De Borman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Betty Batt, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Myriam De Borman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Betty Batt has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Myriam De Borman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Betty Batt has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Myriam De Borman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Betty Batt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 47/47), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 33% (W/L 1/2). Myriam De Borman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 19/13), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 29% (W/L 2/5).
  • Player level: In the last year, Betty Batt has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Myriam De Borman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Betty Batt winning 1 times and Myriam De Borman being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Betty Batt winning 2 and Myriam De Borman winning 1.
  • The last match between Betty Batt and Myriam De Borman was at the Queens Club, 17-06-1946, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Betty Batt getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Betty Batt has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Myriam De Borman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Betty Batt has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Myriam De Borman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Betty Batt has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Myriam De Borman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Betty Batt vs Myriam De Borman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Batt vs M. D. Borman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won1
15Games Won11
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Lost Match100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Batt 0%, Borman 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Batt 0%, Borman 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Batt 0%, Borman 0%.

B. Batt Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
GrassEastbourne - 06-09-1948

R3

GBRM. Eyre
W
6-4 6-2

R4

GBRJ. Walker
L
6-0 6-2
GrassIlkley - 02-08-1948

F

GBRB. Behr
L
6-4 6-1
GrassBedford - 26-07-1948

F

GBRG. Hoahing
L
6-1 6-2
GrassWimbledon - 21-06-1948

R3

GBRM. Whitmarsh
L
6-3 6-0

M. D. Borman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayAntwerp - 08-07-1957

AUSM. Hawton
L
9-7 6-2
N/AOstend - 09-08-1956

F

BELC. Mercelis
L
6-1 6-0
N/ABrussels - 19-07-1955

F

BELC. Mercelis
L
6-2 6-3

SF

BELP. Coessens
W
6-0 4-6 6-2

BELM. G
W
6-1 6-0
banner

B. Batt vs M. D. Borman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
49.46% (92/94)YTD Win/Loss52.73% (29/26)
52.07% (201/185)Sets Win/Loss50.82% (62/60)
51.34% (1746/1655)Games Win/Loss50.36% (556/548)
50.00% (47/47)Clay Win/Loss59.38% (19/13)
51.61% (16/15)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
48.28% (28/30)Grass Win/Loss50.00% (8/8)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
37.50% (3/5)Slam W/L46.15% (6/7)
51% (89/173)Best of 3 Sets Win %54% (29/54)
41% (16/39)Deciding Set Win %71% (10/14)
86% (98/84)1st Set Won, Won Match88% (26/23)
14% (98/14)1st Set Won, Lost Match12% (26/3)
7% (76/5)1st Set Lost, Won Match21% (28/6)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Sat, 22 Nov, 06:10 AM
Prediction
AUSJ. Duckworth1
AUSJ. M. Kubler4
W1
1.571
W2
2.22
Sat, 22 Nov, 05:05 AM
Prediction
TPEK. Lee1
KORD. J. Kim4
W1
1.45
W2
2.51
Sat, 22 Nov, 01:00 PM
Prediction
NEDM. Houkes1
FRAA. Nagel5
W1
1.72
W2
1.98
Sat, 22 Nov, 12:00 PM
Prediction
GERM. Schoenhaus7
AUSC. Dong
W1
1.046
W2
7.6
Sat, 22 Nov, 05:05 AM
Prediction
JPNY. Kawahashi4
AUSC. Ferguson2
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Sat, 22 Nov, 05:00 PM
Prediction
CHID. A. Nunez3
MEXR. Alujas2
W1
1.58
W2
2.2